Home › Compare › Pareto 26.10 vs Pareto 26.9
Pareto 26.10 vs Pareto 26.9: API Pricing Compared
Comparing Pareto 26.10 and Pareto 26.9: on combined input+output list price, Pareto 26.10 is cheaper at $4 vs $10 per 1M tokens — a difference of $6 (60%). Pareto 26.10 costs $0.8 in / $3.2 out with a 1,048,576-token context; Pareto 26.9 costs $2.5 in / $7.5 out with a 262,144-token context.
| Pareto 26.10 | Pareto 26.9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.8 | $2.5 |
| Output /1M | $3.2 | $7.5 |
| Cached input /1M | $0.03 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max output tokens | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Cost @ 10M in + 2M out / mo | $14.4 | $40 |
Estimate your own workload in the cost calculator, or open the full pages for Pareto 26.10 and Pareto 26.9.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Pareto 26.10 or Pareto 26.9?
Pareto 26.10 is cheaper on combined list price: $4 vs $10 per 1M tokens (input + output). At 10M input + 2M output tokens per month, Pareto 26.10 costs $14.4 and Pareto 26.9 costs $40.
Which has the larger context window, Pareto 26.10 or Pareto 26.9?
Pareto 26.10 has a context window of 1,048,576 tokens; Pareto 26.9 has 262,144 tokens. The larger one is Pareto 26.10.
Price snapshot October 21, 2026, refreshed daily.