Home › Compare › Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash: API Pricing Compared
Comparing Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash: on combined input+output list price, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.62 vs $1.39 per 1M tokens — a difference of $0.77 (55%). Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.04 in / $1.35 out with a 1,000,000-token context; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 in / $0.47 out with a 1,000,000-token context.
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.04 | $0.15 |
| Output /1M | $1.35 | $0.47 |
| Cached input /1M | $0.018 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max output tokens | 65,536 | 131,072 |
| Cost @ 10M in + 2M out / mo | $3.1 | $2.44 |
Estimate your own workload in the cost calculator, or open the full pages for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on combined list price: $0.62 vs $1.39 per 1M tokens (input + output). At 10M input + 2M output tokens per month, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B costs $3.1 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash costs $2.44.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has a context window of 1,000,000 tokens; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash has 1,000,000 tokens. The larger one is Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B.
Price snapshot October 21, 2026, refreshed daily.