Home › Compare › Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B: API Pricing Compared
Comparing Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B: on combined input+output list price, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $1.39 vs $8 per 1M tokens — a difference of $6.61 (83%). Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2 in / $6 out with a 1,048,576-token context; Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.04 in / $1.35 out with a 1,000,000-token context.
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $2 | $0.04 |
| Output /1M | $6 | $1.35 |
| Cached input /1M | $0.25 | $0.018 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Max output tokens | 909,000 | 65,536 |
| Cost @ 10M in + 2M out / mo | $32 | $3.1 |
Estimate your own workload in the cost calculator, or open the full pages for Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on combined list price: $1.39 vs $8 per 1M tokens (input + output). At 10M input + 2M output tokens per month, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $32 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B costs $3.1.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a context window of 1,048,576 tokens; Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has 1,000,000 tokens. The larger one is Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Price snapshot October 21, 2026, refreshed daily.